AFGHANISTAN
This
section of the Peace Operations Monitor project maps out a contemporary
and significant international mission - Afghanistan. Use the
menu at left to select the elements of the Afghanistan operations
that interest you. Your feedback is welcome and encouraged.
Recent Updates
Conflict Background: War on Taliban Can Never Be Won. Updated October 21, 2008
Regional Involvement: Pakistan's domestic political situation. Updated October 21, 2008
Overview
Armed Violence
The insurgency and related violence remain
the primary obstacle to development and stability in Afghanistan.
Especially in the south and east of the country violent clashes
between insurgents and NATO or OEF occur on a regular basis.
A report
released by UNAMA in September 2007 found that the number
of suicide bombings in Afghanistan had increased by more than
700 percent between 2005 (17 incidents) and 2006 (123 incidents).
Numbers are expected to rise further in 2007, with 103 incidents
in the first eight months alone. In the first
quarter of 2008, NGOs have been directly targeted for attack
on 29 occasions. Although comparable to last year's figures
in volume (30), the attacks of this year have resulted in many
more fatalities.
Both the insurgents and the international coalition
have launched their respective
military campaigns after the end of the 2007/2008 winter.
Media reports indicate a steady level of violence in the south
and east, and an increase in violence in the north and west
of the country. Insurgents have shifted away from a conventional
strategy to using more suicide bombings and improvised explosive
devices (IEDs) - even in areas where they have little suport
base. Afghan outrage at civilian
casualties caused by NATO forces continues to create difficulties
for the ISAF mission and bolster support for the insurgents.
In an effort to protect himself from the political fallout of
this popular discontent, President Karzai publicly
blamed international forces for rising violence in June
2008, saying they have mismanaged the fight against the Taliban.
Insurgents benefited from this public debate
and a number of other factors: continued access to safe havens
across the border in Pakistan, rampant corruption of Afghan
police and government representatives, the return of warlords
to power, poverty and unemployment, a lack of benefits to some
populations from foreign aid, opium cultivation, poorly applied
opium eradication schemes, and tribal disputes.
As mentioned in one of the UN Secretary-General's
latest
reports to the Security Council, "a key to sustaining
security gains in the long term is increasing the capability,
autonomy and integrity of the Afghan National Security Forces."
In view of this long-term perspective, efforts to train and
equip Afghan forces are being increased and discussions are
ongoing on how to address
serious challenges with the reform of the Afghan National
Police. There are signs that the US is refocusing on Afghanistan,
dedicating
more resources to the Afghan mission and pushing other NATO
countries to increase their own contributions to the mission
in Afghanistan.
Reconciliation and Power Sharing
Many critics of the mission in Afghanistan,
but also NATO leaders themselves, have been explicit in stating
that a military strategy will not solve Afghanistan's problems
and call for a political solution. While President Karzai has
apparently made some contact with the Taliban and there is some
effort towards reconciliation through the Strengthening Peace
Program, no wide-ranging, track one peace process is underway.
The willingness of some opposition forces to share power with
Karzai's government remains in question. A new political opposition,
the United National Front, has emerged to oppose president Karzai.
This group is a mix of former Northern Alliance members, mujahideen,
and even former members of the communist government. Former
Indian diplomat M
K Bhadrakumar has interpreted this as a show of independence
by Afghans who believe the US will not be able to stabilize
the situation.
Regional Environment
Pakistan's role continues to be controversial,
as many Afghans and international observers allege Pakistani
support for the insurgency. A new series of peace deals between
Pakistan's government and local Taliban groups has granted insurgents
wide
latitude in areas along the border with Pakistan. According
to NATO commanders, Pakistan's failure to act against militants
in its tribal areas has led to an increase
in attacks against US and NATO forces in eastern Afghanistan.
Allegations
that Iran is supplying weapons to the Taliban have also become
more common, though the
Iranian government denies its involvement with the insurgency
in Afghanistan. Some analysts argue that Iran may be pursuing
a two-pronged approach, with overt support for the Karzai government
and economic investment in Afghanistan on the one hand and covert
assistance to insurgents on the other hand, thus hedging its
bets and securing influence (esp. in western Afghanistan) no
matter who will control the country in the long run.
Reconstruction
The international community in Afghanistan
is working to improve its coordination and increase aid effectiveness,
while some NGOs call for the military to stop doing reconstruction
work. The situation for women in Afghanistan continues to be
grim, and some claim hard-won freedoms achieved since 9-11 are
in danger of being stifled before a lasting impact on women's
rights can be achieved. Recent murders of Afghan women journalists
and continued forced marriages highlight the volatility of the
situation for women in Afghanistan.
Opium cultivation continues to reach record
levels, and debates about how to tackle this issue are heated.
According
to UNODC, Afghanistan produced an extraordinary 8,200 tons
of opium in 2007 (34 percent more than in 2006), becoming practically
the exclusive supplier (93 percent of the global opiates market).
The United States continues to push for eradication, while many,
including some other NATO nations, fear this only feeds insurgency
and instability. Other alternatives are licensing opium cultivation
and providing alternative livelihoods. The first option has
not been pursued, and the latter has not been sufficiently funded
nor has it had time to achieve any significant results.
Despite the insurgency,
development and reform efforts continue. Initiativens like the
National
Solidarity Programme, in which local councils are consulted
to determine their own development needs, are expanding. While
media reports from Afghanistan tend to focus on the violence
and instability, some parts of the country are relatively stable
and are benefitting from development efforts.